Senator Padilla Proposes Two Bills to Regulate AI Services in California
Summary:
California State Senator Steve Padilla has proposed two bills aimed at establishing a secure and ethical standard for AI service providers in the state. The first bill agitates for safety, privacy and nondiscrimination for AI services and the second urges for establishing an AI research hub. This follows a recent initiative by California's governor for statewide AI training, and a previous bill to protect performers through informed consent for AI digital replications. Padilla recognizes the importance of AI as a public good, and warns against the monopoly of a few over AI's future.
The Democratic State Senator from California, Steve Padilla, put forward two pieces of legislature, specifically Senate Bill 892 and 893, on January 3rd. These bills are essentially designed to set up a secure and ethical structure for firms offering artificial intelligence (AI) services within the state. The first bill, Senate Bill 892, mandates the Department of Technology in California to create safety, privacy, and nondiscrimination norms for AI-based services in the state. Should the bill go into effect from August 1, 2025, the state would be barred from signing any contracts pertaining to AI services with firms not adhering to these norms. Senate Bill 893 intends to get the Government Operations Agency, the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development, and the Department of Technology to set up an AI research hub in the state. Per Padilla's plan, this hub would bolster the research, development, implementation, and use of AI technology for the welfare of the public.
The context: The governor of California recently urged for AI training across the state.
Padilla expressed his pride in California's tradition of being at the forefront of technology and enforcing ethical and safe standards. However, he warned against the danger of a handful of monopolies controlling the future of AI. He emphasized that AI is a public asset that should benefit everyone in society and cautioned against the potential for a small group of billionaires to dominate the future. These bills decline on the back of a recent push by Gavin Newsom, the Governor of California, who advocated for statewide AI training for Californians. In 2023, Assembly member Ash Kalra introduced legislation aimed at safeguarding actors, artists, and entertainers by requiring employment contracts to incorporate informed consent concerning digital AI replications.
These instances are in alignment with the directive issued by the Biden Administration calling for new AI safety measures at the federal level. This order specified six standards for the safe and ethical use of AI within government operations. The ambiguous nature of the order has fostered apprehension amongst insiders about potential hindrances for firms working on technology development. Given California's status as the home of Silicon Valley and numerous evolving AI-focused companies, Padilla's proposed legislature could induce similar worries. Nonetheless, no formal documents have been revealed yet. Padilla's intended action will undergo deliberation and a vote in the Senate in the coming months. Cointelegraph reached out to Senator Padilla's office for remarks on the suggested bill.
Magazine: Which eSports team is optimally prepared for the bullish market? The article was co-authored by Savannah Fortis.
Published At
1/4/2024 5:09:44 PM
Disclaimer: Algoine does not endorse any content or product on this page. Readers should conduct their own research before taking any actions related to the asset, company, or any information in this article and assume full responsibility for their decisions. This article should not be considered as investment advice. Our news is prepared with AI support.
Do you suspect this content may be misleading, incomplete, or inappropriate in any way, requiring modification or removal?
We appreciate your report.