OpenAI Refutes New York Times Lawsuit Claims, Highlights Fair Use Protocol and Media Collaborations
Summary:
OpenAI, in a blog post, dismissed a lawsuit from The New York Times (NYT) as baseless and emphasized its cooperation with media outlets. Underlining its 'fair use' approach and opt-out feature, OpenAI rebutted claims of unauthorized use of content. It declared that content replication was seldom and mentioned collaborations with various media entities including German media giant, Axel Springer. OpenAI detailed its 'opt-out' feature for publishers and alleged that the NYT's accusations about copyright infringement were atypical and unwarranted.
OpenAI has responded to a lawsuit filed by The New York Times (NYT) in a blog post on January 8, deeming it baseless and highlighting its collaborations with numerous news outlets. The blog revealed ongoing productive conversations with the NYT, making the December 27 lawsuit, which OpenAI learned about through the NYT itself, unexpected and disheartening. The lawsuit filed by NYT against OpenAI and Microsoft alleges unauthorized utilization of their content to train AI chatbots. OpenAI refutes this, seeing the situation as an opportunity to outline their intentions, business model, and technology development.
The argument put forward by OpenAI rests on four points. The first being their active involvement and cooperation with news outlets to innovate in news creation space. Second, OpenAI underscores their 'fair use' approach to training but offers an opt-out feature as a gesture of goodwill. The third argument articulates that the replication of content is seldom and being addressed, while the last point implies that the NYT isn't delivering a complete account. OpenAI announced several collaborations in the media sector, such as integrating with Axel Springer, a German media powerhouse, to resolve AI 'hallucinations.'
OpenAI is also engaging with News/Media Alliance to explore potential avenues, resolve concerns, and offer solutions. However, the News/Media Alliance had previously published a 77-page documentation expressing concerns over AI models grooming on data sets that heavily rely on content sourced from news publishers. OpenAI elaborated on their 'opt-out' feature for publishers, restraining their tools from accessing websites of those who implemented it, noting NYT used this feature in August 2023.
A prominent point in NYT's case against OpenAI and Microsoft states that "www.nytimes.com" is the most replicated proprietary source, trailing only behind Wikipedia and a US patent documents database. The NYT alleges that it addressed its intellectual property concerns with OpenAI and Microsoft in April 2023, seeking a peaceful resolution, but with no positive outcome. Despite OpenAI's denial, legal experts suggest that NYT's case is the most compelling to date, alleging copyright infringement by generative AI. OpenAI asserts that the alleged misuse cited by the NYT is atypical and disallowed, and their content is not a surrogate for the NYT. They emphasized continuous efforts to shield their systems from adversarial exploitation to replicate training data and substantial progress in recent models.
OpenAI, concluding their blog post response to the lawsuit, dismissed the NYT's lawsuit as unfounded. However, they expressed a hope for a positive relationship with the NYT, and respect for its historical standing.
Published At
1/9/2024 3:45:16 PM
Disclaimer: Algoine does not endorse any content or product on this page. Readers should conduct their own research before taking any actions related to the asset, company, or any information in this article and assume full responsibility for their decisions. This article should not be considered as investment advice. Our news is prepared with AI support.
Do you suspect this content may be misleading, incomplete, or inappropriate in any way, requiring modification or removal?
We appreciate your report.