Artificial Intelligence Set to Transform Legal Proceedings, Says U.S. Chief Justice
Summary:
U.S Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, in his end-of-year report, emphasized the significant impact artificial intelligence (AI) will have on legal proceedings. While assuring that judges won't be replaced soon, Roberts indicated that AI will alter how judges operate and understand their cases. He suggested that AI can aid the judicial system in striving for quick, just, and economical resolutions but urged caution about false or deceptive information AI might generate. The report follows AI guidelines issued for the U.K judiciary, cautioning about its potential risks.
The Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts, published the year-end report on December 31 from the Supreme Court. In his report, he emphasized that artificial intelligence (AI) will have a "significant" impact on legal proceedings in the future days. The annual overview from Roberts highlighted AI as a key area, where he expressed his belief that even though judges will not be replaced soon, their work, especially at the trial level, will see considerable influence from AI.
Roberts elaborated that the implications of AI will not just change the manner in which judges operate but also their comprehension of AI's functionality in the cases they handle. He accentuated that as this technology progresses, it will be crucial for courts to decipher its appropriate applications in legal disputes. Roberts was of the view that AI could undoubtedly assist in advancing the existing judicial system further towards achieving the objectives of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure's first rule, aiming for a "just, quick, and economical" resolution of cases.
However, he issued a warning about the use of AI, urging caution and modesty. He brought up the issue of AI "hallucinations", where the technology gives out false or deceptive information, asserting it to be factual. On December 31, Michael Cohen, former attorney for the business magnate and previous U.S. President Donald Trump, held AI responsible for counterfeit citations in legal papers.
Furthermore, Roberts emphasized that "computers cannot fully supersede central players in court," pointing out that judges can assess the "honesty of a defendant's public statement” during sentencing. He stated that "delicate details matter" and that judges can interpret clues like a shaking hand, a trembling voice, an inflection change, a moment's pause, a quick eye contact break, or a bead of sweat. He declared, "Humans are still trusted more than machines by the majority to detect and interpret these cues correctly."
This statement from the U.S Chief Justice comes shortly after AI instructions were issued for the judiciary in England and Wales by a group of high-ranking British justices. The U.K advisory guided judges on AI utilization and cautioned them about the potential risk it poses during its trial use. For more comprehensive insight into the future of AI's application in the legal sector, refer to our forecast of "2024's AI legal challenges".
Published At
1/2/2024 2:02:58 PM
Disclaimer: Algoine does not endorse any content or product on this page. Readers should conduct their own research before taking any actions related to the asset, company, or any information in this article and assume full responsibility for their decisions. This article should not be considered as investment advice. Our news is prepared with AI support.
Do you suspect this content may be misleading, incomplete, or inappropriate in any way, requiring modification or removal?
We appreciate your report.